Nothing prepares you for workplace discrimination. When faced with it, you’ve two options: settle or fight it out in court. The question is which is better? Let’s quickly compare settlement vs. litigation in discrimination.
You’ve been a victim of workplace discrimination if you were treated unfairly because of your age, gender, race, or disability. As sad as it is, it’s also unlawful and affects your career and well-being.
Settlement occurs when both parties are ready to resolve conflicts through negotiation. It is quick and saves time, while litigation takes the issue to the court, which can be a lengthy and demanding process.
Often yes. It’s your best bet if you want to maintain confidentiality and get quicker results. It even helps you save money and stay away from the uncertainty of a long-drawn court battle.
The settlement comes with its own set of drawbacks. For one, you may get less than desired compensation and have no rights to publicize or discuss your case with anyone. Second, it limits your future legal actions, with no admission of guilt.
Although time-consuming, litigation offers a sense of justice, public accountability, and a potential for a higher payout, provided you hire a competent discrimination lawyer who can build a stronger case.
In settlement vs. litigation comparison, the latter is hardly a winner, largely because it's time-consuming. It also takes a toll on your mental health and even with a strong case, the outcome is not guaranteed.
It’s not an easy decision. But when you come to these crossroads, think about:
Considering all of this can help you decide which is the best option.
– The strength of your case – Your financial situation – Time and stress you’ve to endure
Whether you decide to settle or fight it out in court, we recommend seeking legal advice as soon as possible. Our discrimination lawyers will assess your situation and help you take the right legal steps. Call us today to schedule a free consultation.