Existing Clients 404-214-0120

B&F Blog

Worker Misclassification Is Focus of New DOL Guidance for Employers

Posted by Kathy Harrington-Sullivan | Jul 21, 2015 | 0 Comments

An “Administrator's Interpretation” has been issued by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor (DOL) to provide clearer guidance regarding how employers should be classifying workers.

Focused in defining when workers should be employees versus independent contractors, this Interpretation, which was issued by Administrator David Weil, is intended to help employers avoid misclassification, which can significantly infringe on workers' rights and protections.

In fact, in the Interpretation Weil specifically noted that misclassification is a growing problem that “is found in an increasing number of workplaces in the United States.” He went on to explain that:

When employers improperly classify employees as independent contractors, the employees may not receive important workplace protections such as the minimum wage, overtime compensation, unemployment insurance, and workers' compensation. Misclassification also results in lower tax revenues for government and an uneven playing field for employers who properly classify their workers.

Economic Realities Test Should Be Used to Properly Classify Workers, DOL Explains

Clarifying just how employers are supposed to classify workers appropriately per the terms of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the Interpretation explains that the “economic realities” test should be used. This test “focuses on whether the worker is economically dependent on the employer or in business for him or herself.”

To address the growing problem of worker misclassification in the U.S., the DOL has just issued some new guidelines for employers, an Atlanta employment lawyer explains.

The factors that need to be evaluated when relying on this test to classify workers include (but are not necessarily limited to):

  • The type and importance of the work done by a worker – Is the work pivotal to the business operations? Does it require specialized business skills (rather than just skills of trade)?
  • Whether the work relationship is temporary or longer-term/permanent
  • Whether the worker retains some degree of control over the relationship/work being done
  • How invested the worker is in a business (rather than just investing in the tools of a trade).

As the Interpretation explains, each of the above factors should be considered equally by employers when classifying workers, and “most workers are employees under the FLSA.” The Interpretation goes onto to point out that:

Ultimately, the goal is not simply to tally which factors are met, but to determine whether the worker is economically dependent on the employer (and thus its employee) or is really in business for him or herself (and thus its independent contractor). The factors are a guide to make this ultimate determination of economic dependence or independence.

This recently issued Interpretation could have big impacts in certain industries, particularly for businesses that have shifted towards primarily classifying the majority of workers who carry out their operations as independent contractors (like, for instance, the ride share service Uber).

What are your thoughts about the DOL's Interpretation and the issue of worker misclassification? Share your opinions with us on social media.

Contact an Atlanta Employment Lawyer at the Law Firm of Barrett & Farahany, LLP, LLP

If you have been misclassified as an independent contractor or if you need help resolving any employment legal issue, you can turn to an experienced Atlanta employment lawyer at the Law Firm of Barrett & Farahany, LLP, LLP for aggressive legal advocacy and the highest quality legal services.

To learn more about our services and how we can assist you, contact us today by calling (404) 238-7299 or by emailing us using the contact form at the bottom of this screen.

From our offices based in Atlanta, our trusted attorneys provide superior representation and legal service to people throughout Georgia, including those in Decatur, Scottdale, Clarkston, Avondale Estates, Pine Lake, Stone Mountain, Tucker, Smyrna, Conley, Marietta, Mableton, Forest Park, Ellenwood, Red Oak, Austell, Lithia Springs, Morrow, Lithonia, Rex, Riverdale, Clayton County, Cobb County, Dekalb County and Douglas County.

About the Author

Kathy Harrington-Sullivan

Kathy Harrington Sullivan is a Partner at Barrett & Farahany and manages the firm's case evaluation team. Because knowledge truly is power, Kathy and the Atlanta employment attorneys on her team regularly consult with and empower potentia...

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

We Do Things Differently.

When you reach out to us, you will receive a complimentary consultation with one of our skilled Atlanta employment attorneys. During our initial consultation with you, we can help you to better understand your rights and will work with you to determine what course of action is in your best interest. We take great pride in providing assistance based on years of experience negotiating and litigating employment matters to protect employee interests. If you find yourself in need of dedicated legal representation, we are prepared to advocate on your behalf – our goal is always to protect employee victims of harassment, discrimination, and retaliation.

Menu